Prolific writers and researchers in addiction recovery continued to play with the idea. David Best and William White started to add definition to the “types of recovery capital.” Granfield and Cloud understood there to be multiple dimensions, but White began to fill in the gaps in 2008 with his recovery capital primer. White then created the “Recovery Capital Scale” or “Assessment of Recovery Capital.” The creation of this self-assessment moved recovery capital from concept to utility.
- How gratitude helps in early recovery and beyond Without gratitude, life is merely a never-ending toil with no discernible purpose.
- Since 2010, numerous studies have supported the utility of using the Recovery Capital Scale with specific populations and in specific settings.
- Downloading the free app, Meeting Guide, to your cell phone allows an individual to see the times and locations of meetings closest to them.
- Longitudinal recovery capital studies incorporating measures of psychosocial functioning, risk reduction strategies, and substance use are needed to better understand how targeting recovery capital may be used as a harm reduction intervention in SUD treatment settings.
As William White has argued, recovery primarily spreads from one addict in recovery to another through the processes of social learning and social control. Inspiration, support and identification are all things you will read about on this site and one of my key career goals has been to document how this process happens. The same year, 2008, William Cloud wrote a paper in partnership with the eminent recovery academic and historian William White, arguing that strengths were a better predictor of long-term recovery than deficits.
This includes your values, skills, knowledge, experience, education, interpersonal skills, and problem-solving abilities. In short ‘recovery capital’ comprises of everything you have working to your advantage when trying to stay sober—the more forms of recovery capital you have, the better the quality of recovery. Recovery Capital is a lot like any other form of capital — most folks have at least a little and some folks have a whole lot. How much you may actually need however is a largely personal matter. Because what and how much can be just as important as where.
Multivariate Analyses
Recovery, like life for someone not affected by addiction, is an ongoing dialogue with those components. We can best think of recovery capital as a specialized representation of wellbeing. In order to assess or see how much recovery capital a person has is the focus on the enmeshment of social, human, and cultural recovery capital.
Recovery Capital as Prospective Predictor of Sustained Recovery, Life satisfaction and Stress among former poly-substance users
In addition, the stigma surrounding addiction is extremely negative, and the general attitude affects the number of resources in these communities. This makes a sustained recovery much more difficult, even when the desire for sobriety is present. Without resources, the buddhist view on addiction multiple perspectives recovery becomes overwhelming and unbearable. Some examples of human recovery capital include an individual’s self-esteem and/or awareness, values, knowledge, mental health, world view/mindset, optimism, education/career, and problem-solving ability.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol & Drugs, 73, 489–۴۹۷. Recovery capital in the process of change—differences and similarities between groups of clients treated for alcohol or drug problems. European Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 58-73.
At the service development level, this means making available a continuity of recovery resources with the intensity and monitoring modulated by the severity of the symptoms present (e.g., Bodenhimer, Wagner & Grumbach, 2002). Finally, for researchers, the stage approach, even with its inherent limitations discussed earlier, is useful in beginning to quantify and qualify the influence of various domains on the recovery experience over time. Overall, adopting a stage approach to identifying prospective predictors of the recovery experience is a promising way to supplement and refine current knowledge and to identify additional recovery resources and obstacles.
For each outcome domains, results (Standardized-β) for the total sample are in the first column, followed by results for each of the four baseline recovery stages. Stepwise (hierarchical) regression of the individual variables in Block 2 retains only the variables that significantly contribute to predicting outcome above and beyond the predictive power of Block 1 (here, baseline level of outcome domain). First, descriptive statistics are presented that examine the key variables under study, and bivariate association among these variables are examined.
Our Services
Recovery is a daily, intricate endeavor that is just as important to one’s well being as their initial sobriety. Unfortunately, very little research has been done on the recovery process. Achieving sobriety is undoubtedly a positive outcome. However, as soon as sobriety begins, the patient enters recovery. And some traditional treatment systems don’t address recovery as the volatile, extensive odyssey it is in its own right.
Recovery Capital is a concept that respects the entire presence and experience of a person.
Physical recovery capital represents the most basic needs for ongoing maintenance – a safe place to live, enough to eat, adequate clothes and access to transportation. Good quality of life made up of meaningful connections, and a sense of purpose further strengthens the chances of recovery. They argued that even with good quality treatment, a person would have trouble staying sober if they had no meaningful relationships with recovery peers, parents, families, partners, friends, and neighbours. Today, there are currently more than 150,000 unique websites that reference recovery capital. The work on measures, and more importantly, how to apply them to improve recovery wellbeing continues and will continue as the data begins to roll in.
Meantime please consider these occasional shout-outs us doing just that. We’re also more than happy to add Professor Granfield and Professor Cloud to our wall of recovery heroes. Too few folks are out there expanding our collective horizons. And we’re overjoyed whenever we come across more confederates. None of that matters though unless you’ve got a clear idea of the concept.
Significant predictors were 12-step involvement and life meaning. Baseline recovery length and the full model were also significant for the recovery stage subgroups, with the exception group 3 for which no significant predictor emerged. The full model correctly classified between 68.75% and 83.3% of participants across recovery subgroups. Greater stress at baseline predicted sustained recovery among Group 1 participants; greater 12-step involvement predicted better outcome in Group 2 and greater social support predicted better outcome in Group 4. Results of the analyses regressing baseline level of recovery capital on sustained recovery, life satisfaction and stress at F1 are presented in Tables 4–۶.
Patients typically have follow-up visits at least once every four weeks. A comprehensive, recovery-oriented care model is utilized in which patients have access to integrated on-site psychiatric, mental health, case management, and social work services. The clinic prioritizes a low threshold, harm reduction approach whenever possible, meaning that established patients with recurrence of substance use are not initially exited from treatment but instead first provided with increased wrap-around support. Recovery is a multidimensional process that includes health, quality of life, and citizenship.
These resources consist of the external forces in one’s environment that can support their recovery. Recovery capital takes into account every facet of an individual’s life that can either support or obstruct their recovery. If the patient reports as sober in their subsequent discharge reviews, that has generally been considered a positive outcome in our industry.
The next steps in this line of inquiry are to work toward developing a theoretical framework of addiction recovery. This much needed theoretical framework will then guide the development of measures that have the requisite sensitivity and capacity to measure recovery capital and to elucidate the recovery process. The authors have planned future analyses using two- and three-year follow-up with this sample to further the knowledge base in this direction. In addition, clinical interventions step 1 of aa: admitting you’re powerless over alcohol and research evaluations among persons with a history if substance misuse need to recognize that for the individuals themselves, reducing substance use is a means to an end, the end is a better life (Laudet et al., 2005). This requires a paradigmatic shift from a pathology-based model to one where optimal functioning is the goal; this shift has gradually occurred in biomedical fields where virtually no area of medicine is without published research on quality of life.
